Tag Archives: Hrincevich

Colorado CAI!

3 Comments

(editor’s note: Stan Hrincevich is a hero in the Colorado HOA fight. After years of fighting he’s gotten a few legislators to pay attention and pass a handful of reform bills. The bills still need work. But the reaction to Stan by the CAI is interesting, and instructive to all of us.)

guest blog by Stan Hrincevich (letter to legislators from coloradoHOAforum.com)

The fight for financial relief for small CAMs in this Bill was not supported by the CAI in the last legislative session. The cost of a license for small CAMs can equal a year’s income: it’s abusive and burdensome. Previous misinformation spread was that the goal was to exempt small CAMs from being licensed: not true, never in any proposal but believed by too many. This Bill provides fairness and relief to small business with reduced fees and educational requirements commensurate with knowledge to legally and competently service small HOAs of 30 or less units. Educational providers are able to offer small HOA CAM courses at a reduced cost. Costs for Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies to implement should be covered in the same manner as completed when the total licensing law was implemented.

The Community Association Institute (CAI), the group representing property manager and HOA legal interests, has been lobbying the legislature to oppose our upcoming Bill to improve the CAM licensing law even before the Bill has been officially submitted. The misinformation and untruths are insulting to home owners and exemplifies how CAI wants to continue to be a protected organization/profession with special privileges and the power to operate with secrecy and no accountability.

Here is what I picked up from legislators about CAI’s objections to our proposed Bill:

1. Our Bill proposes that all CAM fees be documented on a receipt to the payee, include an itemization of the charges, be in compliance with the law (in the case of Transfer Fees), justify charges by work performed, explain how the fee is not included and paid for by HOA dues (duplicate charging), and as in the case of the Transfer Fee, a receipt be provided to the home owner 3 days prior to closing. Additionally, all fees should be reasonable. THE CAI OBJECTS TO THIS! THEY WANT THE PRIVILEGE TO BILL YOU WITHOUT PROVIDING A RECEIPT OR JUSTIFYING CHARGES. JUST DO IT BECAUSE THEY CAN. Do you think Master Card, VISA, Comcast, or Xcel Energy would get away with demanding a payment and not justifying the charges?

3. We want to improve and better define how CAMs must comply with State HOA law and HOA governing documents. No, the law is not very defined but is general and lacks specific accountability. CAI feels the broad and ambiguous statements in the law and rules are adequate. What do they have against requiring any clarity in following the law? This speaks for itself.

4. The fight for financial relief for small CAMs in this Bill was not supported by the CAI in the last legislative session. The cost of a license for small CAMs can equal a year’s income: it’s abusive and burdensome. Previous misinformation spread was that the goal was to exempt small CAMs from being licensed: not true, never in any proposal but believed by too many. This Bill provides fairness and relief to small business with reduced fees and educational requirements commensurate with knowledge to legally and competently service small HOAs of 30 or less units. Educational providers are able to offer small HOA CAM courses at a reduced cost. Costs for Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies to implement should be covered in the same manner as completed when the total licensing law was implemented.

Stan “The Man” and the Transfer Scam

2 Comments

In my book, Neighbors At War, I wrote about a nasty little piece of HOA theft called ‘transfer fees. ‘ They’re hidden deep within the text of your CC&Rs and the vast majority of home buyers never even see them. Sometimes they’re not even in the paperwork. But they can cost you hundreds to thousands of dollars at closing time. What are transfer fees? They’re a scam. They probably refer to photocopying costs which at ten cents a page shouldn’t cost you more than about ten bucks. But the transfer fee is pure slush that pours into the pockets of the nearest property manager or lawyer.

Stan Hrincevich is the HOA Warrior in Colorado who’s long been trying to educate legislators about this scam. And Stan is Enemy #1 on the CAI’s list of really bad guys. To me he’s Colorado’s biggest hero. His battles against DORA (Department of Regulatory Agencies) are legendary. The Colorado Legislature created an HOA Ombudsman’s Office to try to shut Stan up. Sadly, the Ombudsman has no budget, no power and is dumber than a box of rocks. The only thing this ‘Ombudsman’ ombuds for is his own salary.

That’s the background.

Knowing that this same kind of situation exists in almost every state in the union I’ve asked Stan for permission to reprint a recent news release he sent to homeowners around Colorado.

by Stan Hrincevich (www.coloradohoaforum.com)

The HOA Manager licensing law requires disclosure of fees imposed by property management companies on home owners to be in their contracts with the HOA. If you know of anyone who has recently (after July 1, 2015) sold or bought into an HOA and paid an HOA Transfer Fee (this can be identified as a one liner on the closing documents) let us know. These home owners might be eligible for a refund and the management company fined. We will help in filing their complaint with DORA to pursue this issue.

The HOA Manager licensing rules are very weak for home owners and purposely left out specifics and justifications regarding fees imposed by management companies on home owners. However, there is still room for filing complaints and requiring HOA Boards and management companies to justify the imposition of the HOA Transfer Fees in HOA contracts and governing documents. Additionally, your HOA Board may also be required to inform home owners if they endorse such fees and to change the HOA governing documents/declaration to indicate the Transfer Fee is a financial obligation of the home owner upon the sale of their home (which may require a vote of home owners).

When someone buys a home in an HOA they are to be apprised of all financial obligations to the HOA as a home owner. This includes HOA dues and special assessments. The HOA Transfer Fee is rarely if ever disclosed as a legal obligation and therefore the property management company (and HOA) should be precluded from assessing this fee. The new licensing law precludes assessing fees unless it is in their contract with the HOA and/or supported by the HOA governing documents.

Filing a complaint costs zero and we will help as needed.

We will periodically issue this email requesting your cooperation on this topic.

NOTE: THE COLORADO HOA FORUM PROVIDES INFORMATION AND OPINION ON HOA ISSUES BUT SUCH INFORMATION SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED LEGAL ADVICE. WE ARE NOT LAWYERS. ALL LEGAL ADVICE ON COURT CASES AND OTHER LITIGATION SHOULD BE HANDLED BY A LAWYER.

Great Proposed HOA Bill In Colorado

3 Comments

Guest blog by Stan Hrincevich

SB 15-177 concerns proposed construction defects litigation in Colorado. No Bill is perfect and in the world of HOA homeowners’ rights we seize the moment for any reform especially when it reins in the influence of HOA lawyers, property managers, and abusive Boards. This Bill would require HOA homeowners to approve the use of HOA funds in litigation.

Homeowners would have to be apprised of any intended litigation, informed on the substance and estimated costs, the consequences of unsuccessful litigation such as special assessments, and how the lawsuit is to be financed. A majority vote would be required to use HOA funds. HOAs can still bring legal action for construction defects and individuals can still pursue legal action using their own funds.

The Community Associations Institute (CAI) and HOA lawyers hate this Bill as it reins in their mostly open and easy access to HOA funds for litigation by requiring homeowners to first approve of such action. This can save large amounts of money for homeowners and safeguard reserve funds that can now be used for lawsuits. The CAI’s latest and weak argument on this Bill contends a Board would require a homeowner to vote for legal counsel on everyday, routine matters but no such verbiage is in the Bill and this is called desperation. See the article below for more information.

Please take a few minutes to write your legislator asking them to support SB 15-177. If the content of the Bill changes to lose our support we will let you know. Your email does help and helps home owners. Get involved!

CAI Threatened If Homeowners Are Empowered

(article from HOAforum.org)

The Community Associations Institute (CAI), long incorrectly identified as a homeowner-centric organization in the press and by State legislators, is again attacking the idea of HOA homeowners’ rights. The CAI represents the interests of property managers and HOA lawyers and not homeowners. This time they are objecting to a provision in proposed Colorado SB 15-177 (construction defects) that requires HOA homeowners to approve the use of HOA funds in litigation. Why the opposition? The CAI and HOA lawyers view the HOA as a profit center and easy money. Empowering homeowners on how their funds are used considered disruptive and meddling.

Too often HOA lawyers raid HOA bank accounts for legal fees and costly legal cases that should never have been litigated. That leaves homeowners with depleted reserve funds, special assessments to pay legal costs, and/or increases in HOA dues to replenish reserve funds. HOA Boards can currently enter into litigation without apprising homeowners of their intent, the cost and consequences of litigation or how they intend to finance legal fees. Boards can incur unlimited legal expenses and even take out debt instruments to pay legal fees. Home owners in too many cases only know of the financial consequences after the case has been litigated and they are stuck with the bill. This Bill simply reins in the authority of an HOA Board (that is highly influenced by HOA lawyers and property managers) in making decisions on litigation that can have significant if not catastrophic financial impact.

SB 15-177 would not preclude legal action but require a majority of home owners to approve litigation. This would mitigate the number of law suits and the abusive practice of an HOA Board suing on behalf of a very few (as few as two) vs. the community at large. More cases would be handled in the less expensive legal venue of arbitration thus saving HOAs significant sums of money. Home owners could still pursue individual actions using their own funds.

The CAI is fabricating a tall tale in contending that any legal fees paid to an HOA lawyer related to routine advice and counsel would take a majority vote of home owners. This Bill doesn’t get involved in regulating or interfering with the operations and daily functions of the HOA. Legal counsel on enforcing covenants, controls, restrictions, and debt collection or other issues involving common and routine HOA issues would not require a majority vote of homeowners. It’s just not in this Bill. Payment of routine legal counsel doesn’t require a lawsuit today nor would it under this Bill. This Bill is directed at legal cases filed in a court of law that are specific, unique, non-recurring and financially impacting. The CAI is embarrassing itself by claiming that any payment to an HOA lawyer would have to be voted upon. Obviously, the CAI is desperate to kill this bill.

The winner in this Bill will be homeowners in HOA community associations, not the Community Association Institute. Homeowners will now have more control over how HOA assets are used. They will still retain the right to litigate construction defects. This Bill does not impair the ability of any HOA Board to govern but contributes to open governance.