Category Archives: discrimination

HOA Lawyer Tricks

NOTE: The following post was originally scheduled to be published at a future date. Due to Ward’s passing, it has been published immediately for viewing until hosting for this site expires. 
==============================================================================

Guest blog by Donie Vanitzian (LA Times columnist)

QUESTION:  I’m representing myself in a contentious litigation with my homeowners association.  The board has a powerful, well-known law firm representing them.  They know all the dirty legal procedural tricks to use against me and are a machine burying me in paper — I can’t keep up.  Last week they held yet another ex parte hearing with the judge.  I was NOT served or given any notice of that hearing last week and therefore did not appear.

The association’s law firm told the judge that they called me several times and that they also called an attorney I employed over a decade ago who handled my divorce, an unrelated matter to the present litigation.  That divorce lawyer no longer represents me on any matters.  I learned that the association lawyers asked my old divorce attorney to notify me of this ex parte hearing saying that that communication constituted due notice to ME.  On speaking with the divorce attorney he said he got the call late and was unable to contact me until the day after the ex parte hearing had occurred.  Association lawyers also have a process server who verifies that notice of the ex parte hearing was “timely” served on me when in fact they DID NOT serve me at all!  What options do I have?

ANSWER:  Because you’re up against attorneys who have considerable experience and resources and do this all day, representing yourself means this becomes a full-time job.  More often than not, in complex and protracted litigation, you need an attorney to represent your interests.  Or, in the alternative, try looking for an attorney willing to assist with research and strategy without filing an appearance in your case.  In addition to their expertise in the subject matter you require, the attorney(s) must know procedural law.   

Success in litigation is based on legal knowledge, resources, organization and a nose for honing-in on strategy.  Deadlines can entail an often complicated mix of filing formulas for compliance and these deadlines arise frequently, necessitating quick and timely responses.  Even WITH an attorney:

•  You are responsible for monitoring what the other side is doing and filing. 

•  You must understand how electronic filing works and monitor closely ALL electronic filings pertinent to your litigation.  If filings are ONLY done electronically in your jurisdiction, make a motion to the court that you ALSO want to receive paper copies of all filings with proof of service for those filings to an address you provide.  There’s just too much hanky-panky associated with electronic filing and manipulation of service dates.  Also, your attorney may be a sole practitioner one-person office with too many clients making it is easy to miss a filing.

•  You MUST regularly check the court’s online docket but ALSO go to the courthouse and physically review court files at the filing window.  Some filings take more than a week to show up online, a risk you can’t take.

•  You must know all applicable deadlines for your case and how to calendar them.  You have to keep your own up-to-date calendar showing what items have been filed and on what dates — AND — what needs to be filed and the deadline for those filings.

•  You need to calendar every hearing and appearance date whether you appear or not BUT be prepared to appear on your own.  It does happen that attorneys don’t show up for a variety of reasons.  It is better to show up and tell the judge you want to preserve your rights and ask for a continuance for the purpose of having an attorney present — this may help you avoid sanctions for a failure to appear.  It also may prevent the other side bending the judge’s ear as a captive audience to their side of the case.

•  You cannot be afraid to remind your attorney of an upcoming filing date and ask to see a copy of the item that will be filed.  People make mistakes.  Two sets of eyes are better than one.  Sometimes proof-reading doesn’t always happen.

•  You should have hard copies of ALL filed briefs/documents that your attorney has.  If your attorney won’t provide these, you will have to go to the courthouse and get the copies on your own.

•  You can’t risk not having a court reporter present to document and transcribe what goes on in that courtroom.  Not all courtrooms provide court reporters or recordings for transcripts.  Some of the best evidence you may get, may be in that transcript!  Without that transcript it’s a he-said she-said situation and some courts won’t let you file an Appeal without a transcript.  A court reporter should be ordered in advance – and – that reporter should be at that scheduled appearance or hearing EVEN IF you and/or your attorney do not show up!  It is shocking to read a transcript that lays bare the informal banter that occurred between the judge and opposing counsel BEFORE you got there.


Just because a process server says you were served, doesn’t mean you were.  The same goes for statements made by the other party’s attorneys.  If a judge makes a ruling at an ex parte hearing based on false information, you can ask the judge to vacate that ruling and/or even seek sanctions from the individuals that lied to the court.  However, if a ruling has been made, you need to get started immediately.  There are strict deadlines for granting the type of relief you need to fight these improper actions.  Reserving hearing dates and filing motions either to vacate a ruling or reconsider a ruling are a good place to start.

Compile as much evidence as possible showing you were not given actual notice.  Obtain a declaration from your previous attorney stating your representation had ended before the association’s purported notice was served.  Then show you were not where a process server claims you were.  California Code of Civil Procedure Section 128.7 allows you to request sanctions against an attorney who files a motion or makes a request for an improper purpose or based on knowingly false information.  A process server that prepares or signs false proofs of service is subject to sanctions and liability for abuse of process.  If this process server is registered they may have their registration either suspended or revoked in connection with these proceedings.

Once an attorney has completed the task he or she was hired for, put them on notice they no longer represent you and file a Substitution of Attorney with the court.  That way, there’s no question that he or she cannot accept service on your behalf.  You’re always free to re-hire that attorney, but at least you prevent situations like this from occurring.  The key is to act with lightening speed.

Zachary Levine, a partner at Wolk & Levine, a business and intellectual property law firm, co-wrote this column. Vanitzian is an arbitrator and mediator. Send questions to Donie Vanitzian, JD, P.O. Box 10490, Marina del Rey, CA 90295 or noexit@mindspring.com.  A prior version of this article can be found at latimes.com.

The Letter From Dave Clouse

guest blog by Nila Ridings

It seems Dave Clouse had some things he needed to get off his chest about his condo so he wrote the editor of the Bradenton Herald.

Dave’s condo complex, Bridgewater Townhomes in Point Pleasant has a termite issue. Well, really it sounds more like a serious problem. And the termite problem is more serious because the HOA board refuses to allow proper treatment to wipe out the termites.

No tenting! That’s right when termites are severe enough the entire structure has to be “tented” and everybody has to leave the premise for an extended time period. What also happens is EVERYBODY sees this tent and wants to know what it is and why it’s needed. That is precisely why the HOA board does not want this type of negative attention drawn to Bridgewater Townhomes in Pleasant Point. Nope. It’s better to let the termites eat the building to the ground than to let the “outsiders” know the place is infested with termites! I’ve found that to be typical HOA board common sense.

Dave starts his letter with: “Buyer beware! Many people are attracted to the maintenance-free lifestyle that duplexes, condos and townhome owners enjoy. It is attractive to have the homeowners association be responsible for the outside maintenance of your building and property, especially if you only live here part time.”

I must say that is the propaganda that buyers are fed when they are looking to jump into the dark abyss of HOA ownership. He is correct in sounding the alarm of, “Buyer beware!”

The termite concern is just one of many that come with condos. Most people do not realize they will be needing approval for the interior changes they plan to make as well. Thinking of wood floors? Think again. Most condos allow wood floors on the ground floor only. From the second floor up those folks have cork floors. I visited a friend in a million dollar plus ocean front condo in Naples, Florida that had cork flooring. I didn’t like the look or feel of it. She didn’t like carpeting, but wood floors were out of the question. Tile floors? No, no, no, not having those either. Just more reasons to never buy a condo or in an HOA for that matter.

As for poor Dave Clouse, I hope he gets out before the termites digest his home!

(link to termite letter in Bradenton Herald)

 

Trust A Lawyer?!?!?!

Yikes! How can I say that having two brothers who are lawyers? And how can I say that after passing the LSAT and being offered a free ride through the University of Washington Law School?

I can say that as a forty-year journalist watching lawyers in court. Never trust a lawyer.

In the link below, a CAI lawyer has tried to simplify the ‘education’ process for prospective buyers. It’s a good step forward. But I like Nila Ridings idea of making all HOA home buyers sign an acknowledgement that each buyer isn’t really buying a home. He or she is buying shares of stock in a non-profit corporation where every single asset, every bank account, every stock account, every college education account is pledged as security to pay for each and every misdeed, miscalculation, embezzlement and lawsuit involving the HOA.

Run, people, run!

Run from that HOA purchase as fast as you can!

Tell your Realtor, “Don’t show me anything in an HOA!”

(link to new HOA ‘disclosure’ papers)

 

How Many Times Have We Heard The “Gambling Excuse?”

Egads! I can’t count the times when I’ve heard about an HOA board member or HOA manager stealing money to feed his or her gambling addiction. It’s stupid. What’s even more stupid is that 66 million homeowners across the country risk all their life savings by buying into Homeowners Associations in which embezzling is endemic. If you live in an HOA, there’s a massive chance someone you’ve entrusted with your money is chiseling.

Get out! Get out! Get out! Let the national HOA Scam collapse on itself.

(link to yet another criminal stealing your money)

 

Madonna’s HOA problems

Madonna may decide her uppity New York co-op neighbors aren’t worth the rent. She’s suing because the co-op board doesn’t want Madonna’s kids or domestic help staying there when she isn’t physically in the building.

In the story linked below, I don’t read that she’s suing for racial discrimination, but I’d bet my last dollar that’s going to be a central point of her lawsuit. Some white folks just don’t like it when people of color are around. That’s how the whole HOA movement got started in the first place. Don’t believe me? Go look in the title history of your property deed!

Gosh, when is racism ever going to go away? Isn’t it time, folks?

(link to story on Madonna suing her co-op)

 

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/music/celebrity/madonna-sues-nyc-apartment-for-allegedly-barring-her-kids-or-staff-from-staying-there-while-shes-away-report/ar-BBrihNu?li=BBnb7Kz

Madonna‘s claims her Upper West Side co-op in New York City has barred her children and staff from living in the residence while she is not there, according to a lawsuit obtained by Page Six.

The pop star – who has been traveling the world on her Rebel Heart tour – alleges that Harperley Hall “illegally changed her original proprietary lease in April 2014 to say that her children and domestic help cannot live in the unit unless she herself is ‘in residence’ at the time,” according to Page Six.

Her lease at Harperley Hall prevents anyone younger than 16 from living in her apartment without an adult older than 21 also present, according to Page Six.

In her suit, Madonna, 57, said that her career requires her to travel extensively, and that she owns several residences around the world, thus creating an impossible situation, according to Page Six.

Madonna’s four children are all under the age of 21, and only one, Lourdes, 19, is older than 16.

Meanwhile, the singer is currently in the middle of a months-long custody dispute with ex-husband Guy Ritchie over their 15-year-old son, Rocco.