Author Archives:

About

Ward Lucas is a longtime investigative journalist and television news anchor. He has won more than 70 national and regional awards for Excellence in Journalism, Creative Writing and community involvement. His new book, "Neighbors At War: the Creepy Case Against Your Homeowners Association," is now available for purchase. In it, he discusses the American homeowners association movement, from its racist origins, to its transformation into a lucrative money machine for the nation's legal industry. From scams to outright violence to foreclosures and neighborhood collapses across the country, the reader will find this book enormously compelling and a necessary read for every homeowner. Knowledge is self-defense. No homeowner contemplating life in an HOA should neglect reading this book. No HOA board officer should overlook this examination of the pitfalls in HOA management. And no lawyer representing either side in an HOA dispute should gloss over what homeowners are saying or believing about the lawsuit industry.

HOA Lawyer Tricks

NOTE: The following post was originally scheduled to be published at a future date. Due to Ward’s passing, it has been published immediately for viewing until hosting for this site expires. 
==============================================================================

Guest blog by Donie Vanitzian (LA Times columnist)

QUESTION:  I’m representing myself in a contentious litigation with my homeowners association.  The board has a powerful, well-known law firm representing them.  They know all the dirty legal procedural tricks to use against me and are a machine burying me in paper — I can’t keep up.  Last week they held yet another ex parte hearing with the judge.  I was NOT served or given any notice of that hearing last week and therefore did not appear.

The association’s law firm told the judge that they called me several times and that they also called an attorney I employed over a decade ago who handled my divorce, an unrelated matter to the present litigation.  That divorce lawyer no longer represents me on any matters.  I learned that the association lawyers asked my old divorce attorney to notify me of this ex parte hearing saying that that communication constituted due notice to ME.  On speaking with the divorce attorney he said he got the call late and was unable to contact me until the day after the ex parte hearing had occurred.  Association lawyers also have a process server who verifies that notice of the ex parte hearing was “timely” served on me when in fact they DID NOT serve me at all!  What options do I have?

ANSWER:  Because you’re up against attorneys who have considerable experience and resources and do this all day, representing yourself means this becomes a full-time job.  More often than not, in complex and protracted litigation, you need an attorney to represent your interests.  Or, in the alternative, try looking for an attorney willing to assist with research and strategy without filing an appearance in your case.  In addition to their expertise in the subject matter you require, the attorney(s) must know procedural law.   

Success in litigation is based on legal knowledge, resources, organization and a nose for honing-in on strategy.  Deadlines can entail an often complicated mix of filing formulas for compliance and these deadlines arise frequently, necessitating quick and timely responses.  Even WITH an attorney:

•  You are responsible for monitoring what the other side is doing and filing. 

•  You must understand how electronic filing works and monitor closely ALL electronic filings pertinent to your litigation.  If filings are ONLY done electronically in your jurisdiction, make a motion to the court that you ALSO want to receive paper copies of all filings with proof of service for those filings to an address you provide.  There’s just too much hanky-panky associated with electronic filing and manipulation of service dates.  Also, your attorney may be a sole practitioner one-person office with too many clients making it is easy to miss a filing.

•  You MUST regularly check the court’s online docket but ALSO go to the courthouse and physically review court files at the filing window.  Some filings take more than a week to show up online, a risk you can’t take.

•  You must know all applicable deadlines for your case and how to calendar them.  You have to keep your own up-to-date calendar showing what items have been filed and on what dates — AND — what needs to be filed and the deadline for those filings.

•  You need to calendar every hearing and appearance date whether you appear or not BUT be prepared to appear on your own.  It does happen that attorneys don’t show up for a variety of reasons.  It is better to show up and tell the judge you want to preserve your rights and ask for a continuance for the purpose of having an attorney present — this may help you avoid sanctions for a failure to appear.  It also may prevent the other side bending the judge’s ear as a captive audience to their side of the case.

•  You cannot be afraid to remind your attorney of an upcoming filing date and ask to see a copy of the item that will be filed.  People make mistakes.  Two sets of eyes are better than one.  Sometimes proof-reading doesn’t always happen.

•  You should have hard copies of ALL filed briefs/documents that your attorney has.  If your attorney won’t provide these, you will have to go to the courthouse and get the copies on your own.

•  You can’t risk not having a court reporter present to document and transcribe what goes on in that courtroom.  Not all courtrooms provide court reporters or recordings for transcripts.  Some of the best evidence you may get, may be in that transcript!  Without that transcript it’s a he-said she-said situation and some courts won’t let you file an Appeal without a transcript.  A court reporter should be ordered in advance – and – that reporter should be at that scheduled appearance or hearing EVEN IF you and/or your attorney do not show up!  It is shocking to read a transcript that lays bare the informal banter that occurred between the judge and opposing counsel BEFORE you got there.


Just because a process server says you were served, doesn’t mean you were.  The same goes for statements made by the other party’s attorneys.  If a judge makes a ruling at an ex parte hearing based on false information, you can ask the judge to vacate that ruling and/or even seek sanctions from the individuals that lied to the court.  However, if a ruling has been made, you need to get started immediately.  There are strict deadlines for granting the type of relief you need to fight these improper actions.  Reserving hearing dates and filing motions either to vacate a ruling or reconsider a ruling are a good place to start.

Compile as much evidence as possible showing you were not given actual notice.  Obtain a declaration from your previous attorney stating your representation had ended before the association’s purported notice was served.  Then show you were not where a process server claims you were.  California Code of Civil Procedure Section 128.7 allows you to request sanctions against an attorney who files a motion or makes a request for an improper purpose or based on knowingly false information.  A process server that prepares or signs false proofs of service is subject to sanctions and liability for abuse of process.  If this process server is registered they may have their registration either suspended or revoked in connection with these proceedings.

Once an attorney has completed the task he or she was hired for, put them on notice they no longer represent you and file a Substitution of Attorney with the court.  That way, there’s no question that he or she cannot accept service on your behalf.  You’re always free to re-hire that attorney, but at least you prevent situations like this from occurring.  The key is to act with lightening speed.

Zachary Levine, a partner at Wolk & Levine, a business and intellectual property law firm, co-wrote this column. Vanitzian is an arbitrator and mediator. Send questions to Donie Vanitzian, JD, P.O. Box 10490, Marina del Rey, CA 90295 or noexit@mindspring.com.  A prior version of this article can be found at latimes.com.

You Rotten Canadians!

And here I thought Canadians were all so polite. Well, in my experience, they’re a heck of a lot more polite than your typical American.

Still, when people get involved in a Homeowners Association, on either side of the border, tempers can flare, guns get pulled, people get injured and are sometimes even shot to death. So far, all the HOA murders have happened on the American side.

But click this link below and look at the chaos that happens in a typical annual strata meeting (in Canada strata refers to high-rise condo associations). Canadians don’t have the same Bill of Rights protections that we do. But it doesn’t matter what side of the border you’re on, you really do recognize when you’re being robbed of your rights by the arrogant lawn Nazis.

No wonder I’ve been selling so many copies of my book, Neighbors At War, to Canadians!!!

(link to brouhaha in a Vancouver, Canada HOA)

 

HOA Justice Is Rare, But Sometimes Happens

Do HOAs ever find true justice when they’re ripped off by property managers? Well, not often. But once in a blue moon a crooked HOA manager is held to account. Well, kind of.

A couple of property managers in Massachusetts and New Hampshire were caught with their hands in several HOA cookie jars under their control. Over a two year period they stole more than a hundred thousand bucks.

“No contest! No contest at all!” Judges love to hear those words. It means they can dispose of a case quickly, make the bad guys promise to pay back a few bucks, and not have to bother about putting the bad guys behind bars.

Probation instead of jail?

The case linked below is a lot more complicated than that. But the bottom line is that innocent homeowners got screwed. The lawyers all made money. And the embezzlement suspects are walking away with smirks on their faces.

(link to Eagle Tribune story on weird restitution case in HOA embezzlement scheme)

 

This Embezzler Filled With Remorse

Gosh, how many times do we have to hear that line from these embezzlers? “Filled with remorse.” It’s such a load of horse puckey. If you’re going to make a bald-faced theft of 350,000 bucks from your neighbors, the only remorse you’re going to feel is that you didn’t steal enough.

Jill Rouse Boothby of Boothby Realty was a property manager for nearly a dozen Birmingham, Alabama condo associations. Plea agreements like hers are only made if she can plead guilty to a small fraction of the crimes she’s accused of. Halloween is over so we can’t really call her a witch. She’s worse. And with all the people she’s hurt, with all the elderly people who’ve been swindled out of their life savings, she deserves worse punishment than she’ll ever be given.

Embezzlers are monsters. A fine? A few weeks in jail? Restitution? That’ll never be paid. In days-of-old the phrase, “drawn and quartered,” might be used. For those who don’t know, that punishment involves four horses and four ropes. Even that is too good for an embezzler.

(link to news story in Birmingham about guilty plea by an HOA embezzler)

 

Another News Station ‘Gets It’ About HOAs

Have you noticed over the past couple of years how more and more news media outlets are doing HOA stories? It’s a trend that will continue growing as HOA boards and management companies become more abusive. In fact, when the HOA bubble bursts in the coming housing collapse, HOA homeowners are going to be screaming about their vanishing home equity. They can’t complain that we didn’t try to warn them.

The NBC affiliate in Atlanta is the latest station to become a little more aggressive. Here’s the link to their story.

(link to 11Alive story in Atlanta)

I would note, however, that they’ve been sucked in by the CAI lie that the vast majority of homeowners are satisfied with their Homeowners Association experience. Any random poll of people on the street would show a HUGE amount of dissatisfaction with the local lawn Nazis. Just stop people on the street and ask. There’s no poll-rigging on that survey!