Category Archives: HOA violence

HOA Controversies Finally Getting Media Attention

I cannot remember a time in my 40 years as a journalist when so many broadcast stations were discussing abuse of homeowners by their own Homeowners Associations. Denver, Las Vegas, Houston, San Antonio, Florida, Virginia, North and South Carolina. Talk show hosts are inviting homeowners’ rights advocates to join them on the air, newspaper columnists are finally standing up to the incredible falsehoods being spread by those who profit from managing HOAs or supplying lawyers to sue homeowners over incredibly minor infractions.

Another shift I’m seeing, unless I’m fooling myself, is a change in attitudes among the talk show hosts, themselves. In past years many of them have been big defenders of the HOA system. But in at least a half dozen cases I’ve seen prominent talk show hosts changing their opinions and deciding that the kind of ‘democracy’ practiced in many HOAs is getting pretty outrageous.

This week I was in getting some medical tests done and the medical tech told me about some things he had witnessed in his own HOA. He hadn’t been through anything more significant than the occasional nastygram. Those nastygrams! We all get them. But they really do change the character of a neighborhood, don’t they? What makes a homeowner want to attend the 4th of July or Labor Day picnics when he’s constantly eyeing the crowd for the Nastygram Lady or the board members who sling the lawsuits? I’ve lived in neighborhoods both inside and outside of HOAs. And the block party, in my experience, was always better attended in the more traditional neighborhoods.

Anyway, I really do feel there’s a national shift occurring, probably because more and more people are speaking out about the abuses they’ve witnessed or experienced in their own neighborhoods. More and more people are feeling the sting of falling or static property values in HOAs which they presumed would protect their investments. This website is growing…I’ll have more on that in a few days. But people are spreading the word about HOA outrages on this and other forums.

Off topic, but even more important, I wish you all a Happy Thanksgiving, hopefully with family…and with good neighbors.

CAI Law Firms Fight Back

CAI lawyers in Florida (and most likely elsewhere) are whining about one of the few court decisions that ever favored a homeowner against an HOA. It’s a case where the homeowner wrote a check for $840 with the notation, “in full and final satisfaction (of disputed amount).” The homeowner included a letter with the same basic language.

The HOA attorney instructed his clients to cash the check, but only apply part of it toward the original disputed amount. An Appellate Court has now ruled that since the check was cashed, the HOA cannot go after the $38,000 in additional fees it claimed was owed by the homeowner.

This is another one of those trashy HOA scams that have given the industry such a horrible reputation among American homeowners. If a homeowner claims, rightly or wrongly, that an HOA fine was improperly assessed, the HOA immediately begins tacking on late fees, fines, attorney’s fees, collection costs and interest. Florida law forces the homeowner to pay the most recent fees first. In other words, interest, collection costs, lawyers, fines, late fees, and only then can the homeowner ever repay the original debt.

It’s a beautiful system which has worked well for generations of Mafia families and for low-life debt collectors. While the debtor desperately tries to pay his original debt, the associated fines and interest keep rising, as do legal fees and collections. It’s a daisy chain that’s impossible to break. It’s a massive money maker for lawyers and collections agencies who, while doing absolutely no work, can raise their charges indiscriminately and perpetually until the homeowner is broken. Of course, the HOA prances in and seizes the home which it promptly puts up for auction. The lawyers then begin picking through the estate of the bankrupted homeowner. The system is fundamentally unfair to the individual homeowner who never has a chance to plead for his own day in court.

So in this rare decision where the Court ruled in favor of the homeowner, the tears and gnashing of teeth are being heard throughout the CAI community.

(CAI firm’s warning to the HOA industry)

 

Screaming, Hair-Pulling HOA Fist Fights

So you’re thinking of spending your ‘golden years’ in a beautiful peaceful retirement community? You want to live in a neighborhood where neighbors really care about each other?

You have so many really wonderful choices of communities to live, places like Mainlands 3 in Tamarac, Florida. Warm air, well-kept lawns, ocean breezes, bird songs filling the air, happy people wishing each other “Good morning,” or “Good afternoon.”

Before you get too excited, check out the video linked below. It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so tragic. It graphically demonstrates what’s going on in hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Homeowners Associations across the country.

(link to WPLG-ABC News, Miami)

 

Lies, Loans and Liabilities

guest blog by Dave Russell

Lies, Loans and Liabilities

So, your HOA has overspent, misappropriated funds or has simply “run out of money.” Now what? Well the answer here is simple, “let’s take out a loan!” That’s right, if your overinflated mandatory dues weren’t enough, your HOA is going to put you, the homeowner, on the hook for tens of thousands, if not millions of dollars for a loan.

Hypothetically, let’s say your HOA borrows a million bucks, you know, to “pay the bills.” What the homeowner may not realize is that the HOA Manager and/or the Management Company may possibly be receiving a minimum 10% “finder’s fee” for assisting the HOA in acquiring the loan. That’s right, a legalized kickback of over 100K for simply doing, well, nothing.

Call it what you want, a line of credit, or an extended line of credit, but it is still considered a LOAN. Is this really legal? Can your HOA board just simply borrow this money on behalf of its membership? The answer here is Yes and No. Yes, if your association doesn’t have any restrictions about “Loans” in their governing documents. No if there are restrictions regarding “Loans” in the governing documents.

Many associations do have provisions regarding loans however, those provisions are usually buried in a lengthy set of governing documents, that homeowners don’t read, or no longer have in their possession. In some cases, the governing documents require 2/3 of their membership approval before the HOA acquires a loan on their behalf. In some cases, your association may require the signatures of 2/3 of its membership before they sign those loan papers.

It happens often, loans being taken out without the required approval or signatures of the HOA membership. Maybe, I should have billed this story as, Fraud and Finders Fees vs. Lies, Loans and Liabilities.

I’ve seen this little scenario play out time and time again, and it’s wrong, simply wrong I tell you!

If your association is thinking about, or has acquired a loan, make sure it was, or is, being done legally. As the homeowner, you need to read through every governing document including, the CC&R’s, Bylaws, Rules and Regulations, and most importantly, the Articles of Incorporation, which are rarely ever read. Before your HOA makes you, the homeowner, liable for that loan, make sure they have done it legally and legitimately.

 

How to Cultivate Apathy in a Community Association

guest blog by Deborah Goonan

A How-To Guide for HOA, Condo, and Co-op Board Members

1) Start off right – provide as little information as possible prior to closing the sale with a new buyer. Take full advantage of weak state disclosure laws. Delay providing a copy of governing documents and minimally-required financial documents as long as possible. Be sure to charge hefty “management” fees for this “service” to the buyer. Work with state Legislature to minimize disclosure requirements, and the time allotted for a buyer to review information and cancel a sale prior to closing.

–Provide even less disclosure to tenants and heirs of property, perhaps just a summary of the rules

–Make sure that sales agents do not educate their buyers by recommending that buyers obtain a legal and/or accounting review of documents provided prior to closing. The less the buyer knows, the greater the chance of closing the sale.

2) Maintain Developer control as long as possible. The Board will be appointed during this time, not elected. The Developer will maintain weighted voting in order to annex property (thereby increasing the period of Developer control) and amend governing documents without interference from residents. During this time, weighted votes of the Developer or any subsequent bulk investors will control the Board, and therefore the community, despite owner input. If and when turnover occurs, maintain as many Developer-appointed Board members as possible.

3) Communicate with residents as little as possible. Filter communications to present only information that is positive or neutral. Avoid publishing timely newsletters or posting information on a community website. In fact, try to avoid having a newsletter or a website.

Avoid open Board meetings. If state law requires open meetings, make minimally visible announcements, and try not to provide an accurate agenda. If residents show up at the meeting anyway, limit their input to speak to 3 minutes or less. Object if they try to record the meeting, even if allowed by state law.

–If a resident poses a difficult question, display an indignant response: accuse the resident of being disgruntled, unreasonable, unappreciative, or a trouble-maker.

–Alternatively, tell the resident you will “look into” the issue, and then table it. Do not follow up, and hope that if you ignore the problem it will go away.

–Intimidate residents by hiring a uniformed security guard or police officer to attend meetings. Threaten residents who dare to challenge your authority. Insist that the resident “shut up” or leave the meeting.

–Alternatively, immediately adjourn the meeting to avoid confrontation.

4) Conduct secret closed meetings outside the community, at a Board member’s residence, or by email. Hold any required open meetings for the formality of making motions and taking a pre-determined vote on issues already discussed and decided in the secret meetings.

5) Avoid posting minutes of meetings, and, if you must, keep minutes as sparse as possible.

6) Avoid distributing financial reports, including annual budget, reserve, and audit reports. Make residents request these in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested. Then delay response as long as possible, and provide incomplete information if possible.

7) Avoid elections, but if you must have them, control the vote as much as possible.

— Acquire as many properties as possible, because the more property you own as a Board member, the greater the percentage of voting interests you will own, and the more personal clout will have.

–Gather as many proxy votes as possible, by either intimidating residents to give you general proxy, or providing misleading information to obtain a directed vote favorable to your interests.

–Amend your ByLaws to “legally” rig the voting system so that the Board remains entrenched and in control without interference from residents. In large communities, create representative voting members or a multi-tier system of sub-associations with a Master Association. That way, only a handful of people actually vote on behalf of all residents.

–If your state requires secret ballot elections, you still have options. Try disqualifying voters by issuing bogus fines that, if unpaid, are grounds for removal of voting rights. Extend the deadline to get on the ballot, until you can arrange to get an insider on the ballot to challenge any potential trouble-makers. Mishandle or miscount ballots. Force candidates to challenge election results in mandatory arbitration.

8) If residents stage a recall, refuse to acknowledge it, and challenge it in court or arbitration. Work with your state Legislature to make the Recall process difficult to “stick.”