Tag Archives: foreclosure

Vistana’s Continuing HOA ‘Crime’ Wave

People in Nevada know the name, “Vistana.” The Vistana Homeowners Association was ground zero for the massive FBI investigation of HOA corruption, rigged elections, racketeering, bribery, extortion, and maybe even a murder or two. Actually, they’re officially classified as suicides, but one of the lawyers who committed ‘suicide’ had his knees bashed in by ‘persons unknown’ inside his gated community. The kneecapping happened just a few months before his ‘suicide’. Ah, I forgot to add, this profoundly disabled lawyer was able to hang himself from the rafters of a barn. Suspicious? Hmmmm.

With the HOA scandal occupying all the headlines you’d think the current board and management of Vistana would be especially sensitive about obeying the letter of the law. But remember, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.

Yes, it seems the Vistana board needed to tow about 70 cars because of a paving project. Nevada has strict laws governing the towing of cars. But did the board follow the laws? Any of them? I’ll let KTNV reporter Darcy Spears answer that question in her HOA Hall Of Shame, linked below.

(link to HOA Hall of Shame)

Followup!

The State of Nevada has actually filed criminal charges against those responsible for the Vistana towing atrocity. Strange to think of a Nevada crime prosecuting body actually doing some prosecuting!

(link to HOA Hall of Shame followup story)

 

 

 

Conflicts of Interest Abound in the World of HOAs

guest blog by Deborah Goonan

What if your condominium leaks like a sieve? What if the streets flood every time it rains? What if your condo building develops foundation cracks and unexplained build up of mold?

Owners may assume that reporting serious problems to the Board will result in sincere concern and earnest investigation of possible construction defects. They might expect the Board to insist that responsible parties pay for damages and repairs. But what if one of the association Board members is affiliated with the Developer?

Residents of Boathouse Condominiums, Bay City, Michigan, have complained of numerous defects but have run into resistance. Their Board has denied their request to seek defect claims against the developer of their 37-unit high-end boathouse conversion, Marina Place LLC. The Agent of the Developer’s corporation just so happens to be a member of the Board at Boathouse Condominiums.

So nineteen residents have filed their own lawsuit against the Developer and construction company, alleging numerous defects that allow water intrusion into the units, and a faulty foundation. But the lawsuit also lists the HOA as a defendant, for failure to address their concerns.

The Developer denies knowledge of defects, and seeks proof of damages.

Attorneys for both sides are already engaged. This battle could get expensive.

(link to news story on Boathouse Condominiums)

 

More Embezzling, This Time New Mexico

Yes, I know it’s wearying. But homeowners across the country just don’t realize how vulnerable their unregulated, uninspected, unwatched board members are to temptation. Egads! Give an ignorant board officer or property manager control over several million dollars in HOA funds….tell him or her that nobody’s watching, nobody’s prosecuting. Of course they’re going to steal! They will!  In fact, they’ll steal more and more as long as they think they’re getting away with it. Obviously, I’m exaggerating, but not by much!

The latest embezzlement apparently involves hundreds of thousands of dollars missing from Rio Rancho, New Mexico.

LOL! As I recall, this neighborhood had a very shady reputation right from the beginning. Some very suspicious characters (former Florida swampland salesmen) bought up tens of thousands of acres back in the 50s and 60s for pennies an acre. It was absolutely dry, worthless desert land. They advertised on the radio and in TV Guide, “Buy a five acre ranchette in Paradise for just 199 dollars. Know how I remember? My own parents bought  a parcel . In fact, it’s still in the family’s estate if anyone wants to buy it….cheap!

Anyway, decades later people actually started building houses, and Intel set up a big computer operation there to take advantage of the cheap labor. So fifty years later there’s actually a development….and a Homeowners Association. An Association that’s now complaining because some swine embezzled hundreds of thousands of dollars from the HOA bank account.

Life goes on.

(link to story on embezzling investigation)

Why Does The HOA Establishment Reject Constitutional Government?

guest blog by George Staropoli

In my earlier guest blog this month, Uncovering The Real Community Associations Institute (CAI), I presented a number of CAI quotes on where it stood regarding constitutional protections for homeowners, and its claim that HOAs are not governments in fact. What does the HOA Establishment find so horrible, so objectionable, so damaging as to give rise to its rejection of our system of constitutional government?

The only arguments of any worth, regardless of how slight, is the false claim that HOAs are businesses and that this new form of government is what all the members signed up for and is the voice of the members.  Really?  In earlier internet postings on HOA Constitutional Government I presented the alternative of using special tax districts as a vehicle to return HOAs to the Union.  This week I presented arguments that HOAs violate local home rule doctrine and are outlaw governments. HOAs violate even the most liberal of home rule statutes;  statutes that would give the HOA concept  all the local government control of the community, except its creation would now be subject to state approval and to our system of constitutional government.

As an example of how this approach is very do-able, I received info on Florida’s Community Development Districts, a form of taxing districts, but one not quite suitable for HOA governance.   However, the MEADOW POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, GENERAL AND PROCEDURAL RULES document provides an example of the benefits and protections of creating HOA taxing districts.  The Rules document spells out the procedures for managing the district under the state’s Administrative Procedures Act, Rule-Making statutes. It contains rules for record access, open meeting, board conflict-of-interests, etc. all under the municipality statutes.  This is important as district boards and officers, as government employees, are subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000.

What it shows by concrete example is the protections of rights and freedoms for all the people; and a long standing legal doctrine or set of laws written not by profit-seeking lawyers and developers, but by people concerned with good local government under the constitution. It is an extension of the liberal home rule doctrine for local government and good for the people, the community and this country.

How to Cultivate Apathy in a Community Association

guest blog by Deborah Goonan

A How-To Guide for HOA, Condo, and Co-op Board Members

1) Start off right – provide as little information as possible prior to closing the sale with a new buyer. Take full advantage of weak state disclosure laws. Delay providing a copy of governing documents and minimally-required financial documents as long as possible. Be sure to charge hefty “management” fees for this “service” to the buyer. Work with state Legislature to minimize disclosure requirements, and the time allotted for a buyer to review information and cancel a sale prior to closing.

–Provide even less disclosure to tenants and heirs of property, perhaps just a summary of the rules

–Make sure that sales agents do not educate their buyers by recommending that buyers obtain a legal and/or accounting review of documents provided prior to closing. The less the buyer knows, the greater the chance of closing the sale.

2) Maintain Developer control as long as possible. The Board will be appointed during this time, not elected. The Developer will maintain weighted voting in order to annex property (thereby increasing the period of Developer control) and amend governing documents without interference from residents. During this time, weighted votes of the Developer or any subsequent bulk investors will control the Board, and therefore the community, despite owner input. If and when turnover occurs, maintain as many Developer-appointed Board members as possible.

3) Communicate with residents as little as possible. Filter communications to present only information that is positive or neutral. Avoid publishing timely newsletters or posting information on a community website. In fact, try to avoid having a newsletter or a website.

Avoid open Board meetings. If state law requires open meetings, make minimally visible announcements, and try not to provide an accurate agenda. If residents show up at the meeting anyway, limit their input to speak to 3 minutes or less. Object if they try to record the meeting, even if allowed by state law.

–If a resident poses a difficult question, display an indignant response: accuse the resident of being disgruntled, unreasonable, unappreciative, or a trouble-maker.

–Alternatively, tell the resident you will “look into” the issue, and then table it. Do not follow up, and hope that if you ignore the problem it will go away.

–Intimidate residents by hiring a uniformed security guard or police officer to attend meetings. Threaten residents who dare to challenge your authority. Insist that the resident “shut up” or leave the meeting.

–Alternatively, immediately adjourn the meeting to avoid confrontation.

4) Conduct secret closed meetings outside the community, at a Board member’s residence, or by email. Hold any required open meetings for the formality of making motions and taking a pre-determined vote on issues already discussed and decided in the secret meetings.

5) Avoid posting minutes of meetings, and, if you must, keep minutes as sparse as possible.

6) Avoid distributing financial reports, including annual budget, reserve, and audit reports. Make residents request these in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested. Then delay response as long as possible, and provide incomplete information if possible.

7) Avoid elections, but if you must have them, control the vote as much as possible.

— Acquire as many properties as possible, because the more property you own as a Board member, the greater the percentage of voting interests you will own, and the more personal clout will have.

–Gather as many proxy votes as possible, by either intimidating residents to give you general proxy, or providing misleading information to obtain a directed vote favorable to your interests.

–Amend your ByLaws to “legally” rig the voting system so that the Board remains entrenched and in control without interference from residents. In large communities, create representative voting members or a multi-tier system of sub-associations with a Master Association. That way, only a handful of people actually vote on behalf of all residents.

–If your state requires secret ballot elections, you still have options. Try disqualifying voters by issuing bogus fines that, if unpaid, are grounds for removal of voting rights. Extend the deadline to get on the ballot, until you can arrange to get an insider on the ballot to challenge any potential trouble-makers. Mishandle or miscount ballots. Force candidates to challenge election results in mandatory arbitration.

8) If residents stage a recall, refuse to acknowledge it, and challenge it in court or arbitration. Work with your state Legislature to make the Recall process difficult to “stick.”