Category Archives: Fraud

To Spark Some Financial Brainstorming

I just finished taping a TV interview in Denver on the future of Homeowners Associations. The host generally agreed with me that a financial tidal wave is coming that will slam into the nation’s housing market. It will begin with a collapse of the U.S. mortgage industry and HOAs will be the first to be decimated. With the unprecedented amount of federal debt, the ending of quantitative easing, Japan’s weak-kneed attempt to begin its own form of quantitative easing, Russia vowing to outlaw circulation of the U.S. dollar, China’s weakening international trade, a U.S. stock market trading (weakly) at all-time highs, threats of war in Ukraine, Iran, Syria, North Korea, the US/Mexico border, former Communist leaders predicting a return to leadership in East Germany. All the signals for world-wide financial disruption are there.

Outside the TV studio the host asked me a question I had trouble answering: “OK, if you believe all this is coming, where do you put your money?”

Whew! Talk about a million dollar question.

Some experts are advising stashing savings into commodities like silver, copper, any basic manufacturing materials. Others advise using your spare money to pay down mortgages to help you hold out for the long run. Still others say to get ready for hard times you need 9 months of food and water stored in the basement.

I’m not an economist, not even a great investor, and I’m certainly not a survivalist. But if HOAs are the first to be hit in the coming tsunami, why would a homeowner want to pay off a mortgage in an HOA house? With the massive potential for a troubled HOA to bully marginal homeowners with extra fines, fees, liens, legal fees and collection costs isn’t a paid-off HOA home a prime target for greedy (or desperate) board members and managers? Isn’t a supposedly ritzy HOA neighborhood a prime target for questionable slip ‘n’ fall lawsuits where each owner has to fork up money to pay off judgments and legal expenses?

Add to the mix the Nevada court decision (and pending replication elsewhere) the fact that a super-priority lien (the HOA’s petty fine for unmowed grass) can extinguish the first deed of trust (your mortgage) and you’ve got the formula for neighborhood nitroglycerin. It’s unstable at best.

We’re learning more each day about the risks of owning HOA property. Abusive boards, management companies and complicit law firms have brought all this seeming lack of stability about. So, what is the smart investment in troubled times?

Comments?

I’m all ears.

 

“What Hath God Wrought?”

“What hath God wrought?”

It’s the anguished question from the fourth book of the Old Testament.

It was the astonished phrase that opened the first telegraph line between Baltimore and Washington in 1844.

It could also be used to express complete disgust at a current HOA news story from Detroit.

Waterford homeowner Natalie Forte bought a Chevy Volt which she charged from an outlet in her shared HOA garage. She had no problem with paying an extra charge for the power. But she says her HOA demanded four times the amount of power that her Chevy Volt actually used.

What did the HOA do? LOL! They just disconnected all the power to Natalie’s garage, forcing her to use a 100 foot extension cord to charge the Volt from her condo.

Really? Can HOA vindictiveness get any more ridiculous than this?

What hath God wrought?

(link to WXYZ-Detroit story)

(link to Green News)

 

HUD Cracks Down on Housing Discrimination Against Disabled

guest blog by Deborah Goonan

It saddens me that housing discrimination against the disabled is so common. An apartment complex, an independent living facility, and two HOAs are among four offending housing providers in HUD’s early November report.

From denial of an accessible parking space, to reluctance to provide wheelchair access; from denial of an emotional support animal, to terminating residency after short-term hospital stays, management of these communities continues to find ways to try to skirt around the law.

“We continue to see more cases of discrimination against persons with disabilities than any other type,” said Gustavo Velasquez, HUD’s Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. “It is unacceptable that individuals with disabilities have to fight for the opportunity to live where they want, or to have reasonable accommodations extended to them so they can enjoy their dwelling. The cases we’re announcing today reflect our ongoing commitment to leveling the playing field for all Americans when it comes to housing.”

In 2013, almost 54 percent of the complaints filed with HUD (4,426) alleged housing discrimination based on disability.

The stark reality is that most of us will face disability at some point in our lives. For some of us, it may be temporary. For others, it may be a long-term progressive health condition that leads to limited mobility, depression and anxiety, or limited mental capacity.

Therefore, shouldn’t we all be compassionate and understanding? No one guarantees that life will be tidy and convenient for the disabled, their families, their neighbors, or the managers of their housing developments.

It is truly a silver lining that at least our Federal government still takes a role in enforcing fair housing laws. In fact, it seems as though filing a fair housing complaint is the only way to get some HOAs to comply. What a shame that some HOAs are so willing to waste assessment dollars and cause so much suffering in the process.

(link to housing discrimination news release)

Something Stinks In This Washington State HOA!

guest blog by Deborah Goonan

Ruth Crompton and her neighbors recently discovered that 7,000 gallons of raw sewage has been discharged into their storm sewer vault over the past 9 years. It seems that someone, presumably the defunct developer, mistakenly connected Crompton’s black sanitary sewer pipe to the white storm sewer drain. Big “Oops!” The error was recently discovered by the County’s Surface Water Management Division.

Crompton and her neighbors want to know why the County inspector signed off on the plumbing project at the time of construction. Not willing to accept responsibility, the County claims that perhaps a bad repair was made sometime after the County inspector approved the work.

Snohomish County officials insist that Crompton and five neighboring homes belong to an inactive HOA, and that homeowners are now responsible to pay for the cleanup, at a total cost of $15,500. If owners do not comply, they could face additional fines up to $5,000 each. The crazy part is, Crompton and her neighbors never knew about the small HOA. It was never discussed prior to sale, and, without a Board, they have never paid any assessment fees. County records indicate that the community was created as Starlight Park Condominiums. The six homes share a driveway, and, even though the now-bankrupt developer never funded the HOA, owners are just discovering they must share the cost of maintaining their common drainage system.

Ms. Crompton plans to fight against paying for what she believes is the County’s error and responsibility.

Never mind the apparent inspection blunder at the time of construction. Since this HOA never got off the ground, shouldn’t the County step in? And why did it take the County 9 years to discover the problem? Obviously, the County and water management authorities approved construction permits for the developer, who turned out to be somewhat of a dud. Why should the owners – who are truly victims of circumstance – pay for the errors and incompetence of the parties who were responsible for construction from initial permitting to issuance of a certificate of occupancy?

The Ombudsman’s explanation: well, if these owners don’t pay for the cleanup, the County will face sizable Federal stormwater fines, and the taxpayers will have to foot the bill. Sounds like someone is passing the buck – literally.

I predict that County taxpayers WILL pay for the inevitable lawsuit brought by Crompton, and they may also be unable to avoid the federal fines. Wouldn’t it be less expensive, easier, and fair for the County to simply take care of the problem it helped to create?

(link to Herald Net article about sewer system cleanup)

HOAs As “Mini-Governments”

guest blog by Deborah Goonan

A recent article published at Virginia’s TimesDispatch.com, has summarized the proliferation of HOAs as follows:

“(Homeowners’) associations are nearly ubiquitous for new residential housing in the Richmond area, embraced by developers as a way to handle long-term care of common amenities and by local officials as “mini-governments” that can help maintain order and property value.”

The article’s author, Ted Strong, interviewed several county officials on the subject. For readers who may doubt claims of some home buyers that it is nearly impossible to find HOA-free housing in many parts of America, just feast your eyes on the following blatant admissions by Richmond, VA, area officials representing Henrico County:

Kirk Turner, Chesterfield County’s director of planning, said his county wants the associations in the vast majority of cases. “From our standpoint, we actually encourage the creation of an HOA….”

At this point, “probably 100 percent” of new subdivisions in Chesterfield County of at least 20 lots have associations, Turner said.

“To me, the HOA is like a mini-government,” said Henrico County Attorney Joseph P. Rapisarda Jr.

There you have it. The ubiquitous nature of HOA-Land is driven by supply-side expediency and economics. The Developer gets to increase housing density, and therefore, profits. Local planning boards encourage HOAs, because such organizations are viewed as extensions of local government.

Developers love to preserve their “visions” – i.e. perpetual control – of communities they have created. Local governments love the fact that they can just sit back and collect property tax revenue, and leave strict code enforcement to HOAs.

Says Attorney G. Elmore, of the Community Associations Institute (CAI)-member Community Association law firm:

“Associations often help to preserve developers’ visions for common features or aesthetics.”  Elmore is an attorney at Chadwick, Washington, Moriarty, Elmore & Bunn P.C., which represents community associations extensively.

“Well-kept common features help property values and a neighborhood’s livability,” he said. “And associations are necessary if a neighborhood hopes to maintain aesthetic standards stricter than those in county laws.”

Ah, CAI’s vision now becomes crystal clear: without HOAs, aesthetic standards would suffer and property values would plummet. Or would they?

Do we really buy Elmore’s premise?

I think it is true that HOAs can, and often do, enforce stricter aesthetic standards than counties. But, is that a good thing for residents? Not necessarily, when strict standards result in costly lawsuits over flagpoles or home-based businesses.

And taking it one step further, Elmore fails to mention that HOAs can, and often do, enforce standards that limit Constitutional rights of free speech and expression. He also forgot to mention that HOAs tend to fall short when it comes to upholding important government duties such as conducting fair elections and handling disputes over violations with sufficient due process.

Isn’t that the least residents should expect from “mini-governments?”

But wait a minute – back in 2007, CAI issued the following press release in regard to the Supreme Court decision in Committee for a Better Twin Rivers v. Twin Rivers Community Association. Back then, the court decided that HOAs are not governments, and CAI happily echoed the sentiment. Here’s a quick refresher:

• The Twin Rivers decision held that residents of an association not only have the right to express themselves; they also have the freedom to adopt reasonable policies regulating expression in their communities.

• Community Associations are not governments, but rather, private agreements among neighbors; the New Jersey Supreme Court ruling indicated that the government should be respectful of these private agreements.

• Homeowners’ rights of expression and speech are not changed in New Jersey or elsewhere by the Twin Rivers decision, but rather, the case affirmed residents’ freedom to adopt reasonable policies governing such expression.

• Although courts across the country may find the decision in Twin Rivers persuasive, it does not have the binding authority of precedent outside of New Jersey.

• At its core, the Twin Rivers decision supports the rights of residents within community associations to make reasonable decisions for themselves without being second-guessed by courts or politicians.

Well, CAI better get their local government allies on the same page. Are HOAs “contractual agreements” or “mini-governments?”

The last statement about residents making decisions for themselves is blatantly false on its face in most Associations. The Developer creates rules long before there are residents, even before construction begins. And the HOA Board – often controlled by Developers for many years – makes nearly all decisions on behalf of its residents. In reality, the Twin Rivers decision supports the rights of the HOA Board to make most, if not all, decisions, and not be second-guessed by any branch of US government.

Last but not least, note the veiled admission of classic CAI philosophy – that the HOA Board of Directors (aided and abetted by the Community Manager and/or the HOA Attorney) is absolutely essential to maintaining the “vision” by “taking the lead on enforcement, “ because individual owners cannot be relied upon to exercise good judgment.

“It’s a lot easier to maintain a certain style or look or quality if you have an organization taking the lead on enforcement as opposed to relying on individual owners,” Elmore said.

(link to Times Dispatch article on HOAs as mini-governments)

(link to CAI news release about Twin Rivers decision in 2007)