Tag Archives: Realtor

What do you do with a Naked Neighbor?

guest blog by Dave Russell (Arizona community manager)

While HOAs are usually the most disastrous organizations ever created, can they ever really be useful? Well the residents in the Cardinal Glenn Homeowners Association, in North Charlotte, NC are hoping their HOA will soon come to the rescue.

Seems this HOA has a major issue with one of their kookie residents and can’t get any help from city leaders or the police. It seems that one of Cardinal Glenn’s residents likes to wear his birthday-suit while standing outside of his home talking on his cellphone. This, according to the neighbors.

           Edited version of photo neighbors took of the man standing at his door.
Unfortunately, North Carolina law doesn’t prohibit neighbors from running around in the buff, as long as they stay on their own property. That’s right, it’s perfectly legal to expose yourself to the children in North Carolina.

But City Councilman Gregg Phipps, who has to be an HOA board member somewhere, came up with a great solution. The esteemed councilman says the HOA should go after the cell phone streaker because they can enforce some nuisance provision in their CC&R’s. Have I mentioned that the naked guy has been doing this for ten years? This HOA is fully aware of the situation.

Now, depending on how receptive the HOA is to the councilman’s ‘solution,’ it’s going to cost the homeowners plenty of money to take their nudist to court. With NC saying it’s perfectly legal to display your ‘goods’ on your own property, it’s going to be a stiff fight.

I’m now thinking that Councilman Phipps is just as big a nut-job as this naked weirdo. Does Phipps even know how much those legal fees can add up to? When the dust clears, homeowners could be hit with a huge special assessment.

You’d think a problem solving councilman could have come up with a new ordinance prohibiting naked cellphone calls.

 

Some HOA Humor from Florida’s Jan Bergemann

FLORIDA-FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING?
HAVING FUN?

 

Opinion By Jan BergemannPublished March 1, 2015
All over Florida we see lawsuits popping up against owners who use the laws established in  2009 by the Florida Legislature [FS 720.3075 (4)(a) and FS 373.185] to change their landscaping to preserve water and avoid heavy fertilizing with dangerous chemicals. There was reason this law passed — and the folks insisting that the original rules of the community have to be obeyed by should finally realize that Florida-Friendly Landscaping can look as well very pretty, sometimes a lot nicer than a boring green lawn.But since laws obviously haven’t changed their minds yet, maybe some humor will?Here it goes:

GOD and LAWN CARE

GOD to ST. FRANCIS:

Frank,  …  You know all about gardens and nature. What in the world is going on down there on the planet?  What happened to the dandelions, violets, milkweeds and stuff I started eons ago?   I had a perfect no-maintenance garden plan. Those plants grow in any type of soil, withstand drought and multiply with abandon. The nectar from the long-lasting blossoms attracts butterflies, honey bees and flocks of songbirds. I expected to see a vast garden of colors by now. But, all I see are these green rectangles.
St. FRANCIS:

It’s the tribes that settled there, Lord. The Suburbanites. They started calling your flowers ‘weeds’ and went to great lengths to kill them and replace them with grass.
GOD:

Grass? But, it’s so boring. It’s not colorful. It doesn’t attract butterflies, birds and bees; only grubs and sod worms. It’s sensitive to temperatures. Do theseSuburbanites really want all that grass growing there?
ST. FRANCIS:

Apparently so, Lord. They go to great pains to grow it and keep it green. They begin each spring by fertilizing grass and poisoning any other plant that crops up in the lawn.
GOD:

The spring rains and warm weather probably make grass grow really fast. That must make the Suburbanites happy.

ST FRANCIS:

Apparently not, Lord. As soon as it grows a little, they cut it-sometimes twice a week.
GOD:

They cut it? Do they then bale it like hay?

ST. FRANCIS:

Not exactly, Lord. Most of them rake it up and put it in bags.
GOD:

They bag it? Why? Is it a cash crop? Do they sell it?
ST. FRANCIS:

No, Sir, just the opposite. They pay to throw it away.
GOD:

Now, let me get this straight. They fertilize grass so it will grow. And, when it does grow, they cut it off and pay to throw it away?
ST. FRANCIS:

Yes, Sir.
GOD:

These Suburbanites must be relieved in the summer when we cut back on the rain and turn up the heat. That surely slows the growth and saves them a lot of work.

ST. FRANCIS:

You aren’t going to believe this, Lord. When the grass stops growing so fast, they drag out hoses and pay more money to water it, so they can continue to mow it and pay to get rid of it.
GOD:

What nonsense. At least they kept some of the trees. That was a sheer stroke of genius, if I do say so myself. The trees grow leaves in the spring to provide beauty and shade in the summer. In the autumn, they fall to the ground and form a natural blanket to keep moisture in the soil and protect the trees and bushes. It’s a natural cycle of life. 

ST. FRANCIS:

You better sit down, Lord. The Suburbanites have drawn a new circle. As soon as the leaves fall, they rake them into great piles and pay to have them hauled away.
GOD:

No!? What do they do to protect the shrub and tree roots in the winter to keep the soil moist and loose?
ST. FRANCIS:

After throwing away the leaves, they go out and buy something which they call mulch. They haul it home and spread it around in place of the leaves.
GOD:

And where do they get this mulch?
ST. FRANCIS:

They cut down trees and grind them up to make the mulch.
GOD:

Enough! I don’t want to think about this anymore.

St. Catherine, you’re in charge of the arts. What movie have you scheduled for us tonight?

ST. CATHERINE:

‘Dumb and Dumber’, Lord. It’s a story about….
GOD:

Never mind, I think I just heard the whole story from St. Francis.

 

ARE WE HAVING FUN YET?

HOA Embezzlement Hits All, From High & Mighty to Small & Weak

guest blog by Deborah Goonan

Some readers may be under the impression that embezzlement of HOA funds only happens to Homeowners’ Associations (HOAs) with hundreds or thousands of units and elaborate amenities that translate to big operating budgets. I’ve talked to some people that think these cases are limited to certain parts of the country such as the Sunbelt states or major cities.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Even modest HOA communities in small towns are at risk for theft of funds by rogue Board members, community managers, or Developers.

Take Skyview Estates, for example. Skyview is a relatively small townhouse community of a few dozen homes located in Richland, PA, a town with a population of less than 1600. The nearest city is Johnstown, PA, with a population of about 20,000. There are no amenities such as a pool, and houses are located on one street named after the company that developed the community.

Three members of the family owned business, Julz Development Group LLC, were recently arrested for stealing nearly $80,000 in HOA assessments over a period of five years. Dennis Michaels, his wife Julie Michaels, and daughter Juliana Zamias constructed Skyview Estates beginning in 2006. As is typical of HOAs, the developer controlled its Board of Directors during construction. Homeowners elected a Board of volunteer owners beginning in 2013, and that’s when Board President, David Mishler, discovered that money was missing. The Board authorized a forensic audit, which resulted in charges being filed against Juliana Zamias and her parents. The audit found that numerous checks were written for “cash” and money was transferred to personal accounts with no explanation.

Active real estate listings for homes in Skyview Estates, priced between $130,000 – $160,000, note HOA fees of $125 per month, to cover lawn maintenance and snow removal.  For an HOA of less than 50 homes, $80,000 probably exceeds the amount of assessments it collects in an entire year.

As is often the case, theft of HOA funds can occur for several years before it is discovered, and those perpetrating the crime are usually considered to be trustworthy. (See Characteristics of Embezzlers, linked below)

The management and political structure of HOAs provides ample opportunity for mishandling of funds, because only a few individuals have access to the collective assessments of the community. In the case of Skyview, it was the Developers. But even after the developer turns over control to volunteer homeowners, it is all too common for the Board of Directors to place control of the money in the hands of one Officer or a hired Community Manager. In some cases, two or more people can work together to defraud homeowners, a little bit at a time, over many months or years.

In Pennsylvania, where Skyview Estates is located, the penalty for embezzlement of cash or property worth more than $2000 is a fine of up to $15,000, up to 7 years in prison, or both. (18 Penn. Con. Stat. § 3903.)

However, most local law enforcement agencies lack adequate funding and training to fully investigate white-collar crime. That means quite often, even after discovered and prosecuted, those who steal from HOA coffers end up with light sentences. Although convicted individuals may be required to provide restitution, the HOA is often unable to fully recover the loss. Even if the HOA carries a valid fidelity insurance policy to cover loss from theft, there is usually a deductible and a subsequent increase in insurance premiums. Sometimes insurance companies drop coverage altogether, leaving the neighborhood completely unprotected.

By contrast, embezzlement of more than $1000 from the federal government or a federal agency results in a fine of $250,000, up to 10 years in prison, or both. For amounts under $1000, the fine can be up to $100,000, up to a year in prison, or both. (USCA §641)

Small communities provide big opportunities for embezzlers, mainly because everyone knows and trusts the individual or individuals with access to HOA bank accounts. And with relatively little accountability, even after being caught, it is no wonder we read several reports of HOA embezzlement on a weekly basis.

(link to WJAC TV report of HOA embezzlement charges)

(characteristics of embezzlers)

(link to Pennsylvania embezzlement laws)

(link to federal embezzlement laws)

Bashing the Handicapped Elderly

We all saw what happened a few days ago when a Missouri HOA refused a sick girl’s request for a playhouse. It went viral, and newspapers and TV stations around the world began covering the story. A certain little HOA president was bombarded with hate calls and mail.

Here’s another case that’s so outrageous it’ll make you spitting mad.

In Atlanta, Rosetta Turner just got out of weeks of intensive care but she’s being harassed to death by the Providence Place Homeowners Association. Rosetta is up to date on her dues. But the HOA has compiled two pages of violations, most of which are not specified. They’ve even fined Rosetta because her home care nurses park on the street, the only place that’s available.

The evil at Providence Place HOA gets worse! Oh, does it get worse.

This fragile, elderly surgical patient now has no running water. Yes, to aggravate the injury and the public humiliation, Providence Place has disconnected her water and won’t turn it back on until she pays thousands of dollars of fines for these violations.

Time to get the NAW grapevine going again!

(link to WSBT News, Atlanta)

Providence Place HOA
2555 Flat Shoals Rd,
Atlanta, GA 30349
(770) 996-1605
Providence Place HOA, 2555 Flat Shoals Rd, College Park, GA, 30349

 

 

 

Dallas Jews Face Yet Another First Amendment Fight

guest blog by Deborah Goonan

About a month ago, I wrote about Congregation Toras Chaim (CTC).  With the help of Liberty Institute, CTC prevailed in a lawsuit filed by their HOA with regard to a dispute over deed restrictions limiting HOA homes to “single family use.” Based upon two Texas laws protecting religious freedom, a Colin County judge threw out an HOA’s case against owners of a home used as an Orthodox Jewish synagogue.

But that’s not the end of the story.

On March 2, 2015, the City of Dallas filed suit against CTC and the owners of the property at 7103 Mumford St, Mark B. and Judith D. Gothelf. The petition claims that the defendants have failed to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) required by the City of Dallas for all non-residential uses of property. The City insists that the property be brought into compliance with local ordinances before they will issue a CO for the property.

Specifically, the City explains:

Currently, Defendants’ only permissible use of the Property is a single family use. Any other use of the Property that would require a CO [Certificate of Occupancy], such as the proposed use as a synagogue, without first obtaining a CO and complying with the life-safety requirements entailed therein, presents a substantial danger of injury or adverse health impact to persons and/or property of persons other than the Defendants.”

Curiously, the dispute over the CO and ordinance requirements stretches back to November 2013, not long after homeowner David R. Schneider filed his first lawsuit against the Gothelfs on the matter of deed restrictions in the McKamy IV and V HOA.

The City is now requiring that multiple modifications be made to the property, including adding 13 parking spaces, adding a firewall barrier between the first and second floors of the dwelling, and handicap accessible features including 2 wheelchair accessible restrooms on the first floor. The estimated cost to bring the Mumford Street home into compliance: roughly $200,000.

Attorneys from Liberty Institute, representing the Gothelfs and CTC have been back and forth with the City of Dallas for 18 months, initially arguing that the CTC is exempt from the City’s bureaucratic ordinance requirements based upon state and federal laws governing religious freedom.  After all, they argue, the congregation of Orthodox Jewish families is smaller than most Christian Bible Study groups that meet in residential homes, without being required to comply with cost-prohibitive and unnecessary city codes.

The City claims they are within their legal rights to insist upon CO requirements, despite religious use status, state and federal law. The Congregation, through their attorney, then proposed a modification of their request, to ensure a maximum capacity of less than 50 occupants, but despite the good faith effort to compromise, the City has refused to back down on its requirements. In fact, every attempt of the CTC to compromise and avoid litigation has been rejected, or the City has changed the requirements yet again. The City now claims it will allow the defendants to formally request a special exception or variance, however if that request is denied, the modifications will have to be made within 14 days. If the deadlines are not met, CTC faces $1,000 per day fines for non-compliance.

According to the Rabbi, about 10 people attend daily religious study, and about 30 attend on the Sabbath, arriving on foot since their faith forbids driving on the Sabbath.

Also according to the Rabbi, the cost of extensive modifications combined with the cost of daily fines threatens the very existence of the Congregation. Its members would have to move to a different location within walking distance of their gathering place for weekly services.

Is it the City’s intent to protect religious freedom or to circumvent First Amendment rights by way of unreasonable enforcement of ordinances? And why has the City chosen to stop working with the Congregation and property owners now, on the heels of dismissal of the HOA’s case against them?

This battle for First Amendment rights is not over. The Liberty Institute has issued a statement that it plans to aggressively defend the religious rights of CTC.

“This outcome matters,” said Kelly Shackelford, Liberty Institute President & CEO.

“Any verdict that does not protect this congregation would be tragic. Not only for them, not only for Dallas, but for America. If small meetings by people of faith are not allowed in their homes, that would greatly damage religious freedom for all.”

(link to previous blog)

(link to WFAA TV news coverage of suit filed by City of Dallas)

(link to Dallas News article coverage of news conference)

(link to statement from Liberty Institute)