The unfortunate folks in this neighborhood are only missing $20,000. That’s peanuts compared to the millions and millions of dollars lost in other crooked HOAs. But when you buy into a glorified ‘investment club’ (which is technically all a Homeowners Association really is) you shouldn’t complain when you get ripped off.
Still, for the record, here’s a link to another story on homeowners who feel they’ve been cheated.
Yep, I’ve said in the past that the out-of-control HOA movement is an international problem. The American HOA movement is outrageous, of course. But the newspaper article linked below shows some parallel problems in South Africa. They don’t have the Bill of Rights that we do. But it appears their HOA leaders are just as vicious.
Have fun reading!
(link to article on South African HOA speeders)
http://www.moneyweb.co.za/moneyweb-south-africa/home-owners-association-the-new-traffic-cops-in-to
I would have made a rotten fiction writer. Just about the time I dreamed up the wildest possible plot, some actual news story would break that wrecked my work of fiction. And Ladies & Gents? It’s happened again and this one’s a whopper. But it’s all true.
This month, the U.S. Attorney is scheduled to go to trial in one of the biggest public corruption cases in history. Thirty crooks have already pleaded guilty. And they’ll be testifying against nine of their former friends in the HOA corruption case. Organized crime involving racketeering, money laundering, mail fraud, election fraud and about fifty other federal charges. There are even some hints about connections with a Mexican drug cartel! The bad guys are police officials, attorneys, politicians, a TV star, well-known public figures.
Now, two of the most prominent politicians in Nevada (who are also under investigation for public corruption) are going to monkey skip right under the limbo pole. “How low can you go? Everybody limbo, now!”
Yep, the Department of Justice has decided it’s not going to prosecute or even investigate Nevada Senators Harry Reid and Mike Lee. One Democrat and one Republican. It apparently doesn’t matter what they did, they’ve been declared off-limits and the FBI has been ordered off the case!
There are lots of honest people in Nevada. I have some very good friends who live in Nevada. But it’s time to let you know, folks, the stench rising from your state is beyond polite description. You folks need to pay attention to the headlines. Your state’s economy is based on tourism and tourists don’t want to get pummeled and robbed. Home buyers don’t want the value of their vacation homes to drop 80 and 90 percent. A lot of Vistana homeowners were made penniless by these criminals.
Get with it, Nevada! Sniff the air!
The Good Lord knows I love Republicans. Truth be told, I’m pretty Libertarian… stay out of my life and I’ll stay out of yours.
But this Legislator in Arizona is either smoking too strong a brand of ‘stuff’, or somebody has slipped a Haight Ashbury tab into her punch. What is she thinking? She’s now painting a legislative bull’s eye on the back of every ‘gimp’ in the state. (If you’ve read my book, Neighbors At War, you’ve read my ‘gimp story. It’s pretty outrageous.
But back to the ‘Cute Young Thing’, aka, The Bimbo. The opinion of an Arizona attorney linked below shows The Bimbo’s other side. Her face may be pretty but looks can fool you. The position she’s putting her constituents in is pretty hideous. I would readily vote for a Republican, but this one is worth sending to the trailer out back of the big house.
(link to lawyer’s opinion of Ugenti legislation)
BTW, we’re now getting 50,000 new readers a month. No wonder she’s talking to all those reporters and fellow legislators and blasting Neighbors At War! Keep blasting, Cutie Pie. I like your smile.
guest blog by George Staropoli
I thank Ward for covering the developments at the Virginia Legislature regarding:
1) the right of HOA to fine members even though the sacrosanct CC&Rs contract does not permit them,
2) making fines the same as assessments thereby allowing for foreclosure for the nonpayment of fines, and
3) overriding the Virginia Supreme Court’s holding in Unit Owners v. Gillman (1982) that fines are a government power that cannot be delegated.
Virginia’s HB 791, the bill in question, makes use of the statutory mandate word, shall, which can lead to claims of HOAs as state actors because they are obligated to do the bidding of the state. “The board of directors shall also have the power . . . to (ii) assess charges against any member for any violation of the declaration or rules and regulations,” except if explicitly forbidden in the declaration. (Sections 55-513(B) and 55-79.80:2(A)).
Yet in Gillman the Virginia Supreme Court held,
We do not agree that it was ever the intent of the General Assembly of Virginia that the owners of units in a condominium be a completely autonomous body, or that such would be
permitted under the federal and state constitutions. Admittedly, the Act is designed to and does permit the exercise of wide powers by an association of unit owners. However, these powers are limited by general law and by the Condominium Act itself.
What HB 791 does is to make HOA fines legal under Virginia’s statutes. Ha! Take that! By fiat, by statute, HOAs are permitted to impose a draconian monetary penalty against homeowners – the right to make them homeless through foreclosure.
The Court in Gillman went on further to say,
“The imposition of a fine is a governmental power. The sovereign cannot be preempted of this power, and the power cannot be delegated or exercised other than in accordance with the provisions of the Constitutions of the United States and of Virginia. Neither can a fine be imposed disguised as an assessment. . . . We think it clear that the Gillmans were being punished, not assessed, and hold the action of the Association to have been impermissible.
And very importantly from a constitutional point of view (my emphasis), “A condominium restriction or limitation, reasonably related to a legitimate purpose, does not inherently violate a fundamental right and may be enforced if it serves a legitimate purpose and is reasonably applied.”
What is the genuine government interest to impose draconian monetary penalties for the failure to pay a private organization’s penalty?
If it is argued, but has not yet been so argued, that HOAs are vital to the welfare of the community in general and to somehow provide for the greater community’s happiness, then what we have is the HOA acting as an arm of the state. The HOA is then subject to the Constitution as if it were a state government entity.
(UPDATE FROM WEBMASTER: even though the State of Virginia may have modified its proposed legislation, George’s point should be kept in mind because other states may begin going down the same unconstitutional path as Virginia was headed.)
